Select Page

Bridging the gap between politics and hard-working citizens

Meet AnaleeDonate

The Candidate

Analee Berretto

Libertarian Candidate for State Rep. District 69

A lifelong Rhode Islander, Analee A. (Sousa) Berretto was raised in Bristol. A graduate of Bristol High School, Analee graduated with a BS in history from Rhode Island College, and studied criminal justice at Roger Williams University. She earned her certification in Early Childhood Education from the Community College of Rhode Island, and owns The Garden Playschool in Warren.

The Problem

State Debt*

State Population*

Debt per Citizen*

RI's Rank for Top States for Business

  • New Hampshire
  • Vermont
  • Maine
  • Massachusetts
  • Rhode Island
  • Connecticut

Unemployment Rankings

The Solutions

One look at a local newspaper or your favorite online news feed reveals an almost endless barrage of headlines about politicians stealing, cheating, and lying – all manner of breaking the public trust. I realized I could sit by and let it continue, or I could step up to make a difference.

I choose to make a difference.

Won’t you help me help you and our families bridge the gap between politics and hard-working families? I respectfully ask for your vote on November 8 and your support now so I may represent you at the Rhode Island State House for the next two years. Our towns deserve proper representation.

My #1 goal as your Representative is to bring true representation back to the role. In an open, respectful, and dignified manner I will listen to you, my constituents, and vote according to your interests, and act in a manner that preserves liberty and benefits the citizens of our district.

Among the other important issues I feel are the hardest-hitting for Bristol and Portsmouth are:

  • No tolls
  • End legislative, community, and departmental grants – require a vote
  • Support Line Item Veto – stop wasteful spending
  • Promote Ethics Reform
  • Support Free Market – ease regulations to promote local business
  • Support our Veterans
  • Protect our individual rights
  • True transparency – Clear and direct communication builds trust. I am committed to open dialogue with constituents and getting voter feedback.

What is a Libertarian?

The Party of Principle

Minimum Government | Maximum Freedom

Key Concepts of Libertarianism

as written by David Boaz in “Libertarianism: A Primer”

Individualism

Libertarians see the individual as the basic unit of social analysis. Only individuals make choices and are responsible for their actions. Libertarian thought emphasizes the dignity of each individual, which entails both rights and responsibility. The progressive extension of dignity to more people — to women, to people of different religions and different races — is one of the great libertarian triumphs of the Western world.

Individual Rights

Because individuals are moral agents, they have a right to be secure in their life, liberty, and property. These rights are not granted by government or by society; they are inherent in the nature of human beings. It is intuitively right that individuals enjoy the security of such rights; the burden of explanation should lie with those who would take rights away.

Spontaneous Order

A great degree of order in society is necessary for individuals to survive and flourish. It’s easy to assume that order must be imposed by a central authority, the way we impose order on a stamp collection or a football team. The great insight of libertarian social analysis is that order in society arises spontaneously, out of the actions of thousands or millions of individuals who coordinate their actions with those of others in order to achieve their purposes. Over human history, we have gradually opted for more freedom and yet managed to develop a complex society with intricate organization. The most important institutions in human society — language, law, money, and markets — all developed spontaneously, without central direction. Civil society — the complex network of associations and connections among people — is another example of spontaneous order; the associations within civil society are formed for a purpose, but civil society itself is not an organization and does not have a purpose of its own.

The Rule of Law

Libertarianism is not libertinism or hedonism. It is not a claim that “people can do anything they want to, and nobody else can say anything.” Rather, libertarianism proposes a society of liberty under law, in which individuals are free to pursue their own lives so long as they respect the equal rights of others. The rule of law means that individuals are governed by generally applicable and spontaneously developed legal rules, not by arbitrary commands; and that those rules should protect the freedom of individuals to pursue happiness in their own ways, not aim at any particular result or outcome.

Limited Government

To protect rights, individuals form governments. But government is a dangerous institution. Libertarians have a great antipathy to concentrated power, for as Lord Acton said, “Power tends to corrupt and absolute power corrupts absolutely.” Thus they want to divide and limit power, and that means especially to limit government, generally through a written constitution enumerating and limiting the powers that the people delegate to government. Limited government is the basic political implication of libertarianism, and libertarians point to the historical fact that it was the dispersion of power in Europe — more than other parts of the world — that led to individual liberty and sustained economic growth.

Free Markets

To survive and to flourish, individuals need to engage in economic activity. The right to property entails the right to exchange property by mutual agreement. Free markets are the economic system of free individuals, and they are necessary to create wealth. Libertarians believe that people will be both freer and more prosperous if government intervention in people’s economic choices is minimized.

The Virtue of Production

Much of the impetus for libertarianism in the seventeenth century was a reaction against monarchs and aristocrats who lived off the productive labor of other people. Libertarians defended the right of people to keep the fruits of their labor. This effort developed into a respect for the dignity of work and production and especially for the growing middle class, who were looked down upon by aristocrats. Libertarians developed a pre-Marxist class analysis that divided society into two basic classes: those who produced wealth and those who took it by force from others. Thomas Paine, for instance, wrote, “There are two distinct classes of men in the nation, those who pay taxes, and those who receive and live upon the taxes.” Similarly, Jefferson wrote in 1824, “We have more machinery of government than is necessary, too many parasites living on the labor of the industrious.” Modern libertarians defend the right of productive people to keep what they earn, against a new class of politicians and bureaucrats who would seize their earnings to transfer them to nonproducers.

Natural Harmony of Interests

Libertarians believe that there is a natural harmony of interests among peaceful, productive people in a just society. One person’s individual plans — which may involve getting a job, starting a business, buying a house, and so on — may conflict with the plans of others, so the market makes many of us change our plans. But we all prosper from the operation of the free market, and there are no necessary conflicts between farmers and merchants, manufacturers and importers. Only when government begins to hand out rewards on the basis of political pressure do we find ourselves involved in group conflict, pushed to organize and contend with other groups for a piece of political power.

Peace

Libertarians have always battled the age-old scourge of war. They understood that war brought death and destruction on a grand scale, disrupted family and economic life, and put more power in the hands of the ruling class — which might explain why the rulers did not always share the popular sentiment for peace. Free men and women, of course, have often had to defend their own societies against foreign threats; but throughout history, war has usually been the common enemy of peaceful, productive people on all sides of the conflict.

Contact

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Follow the Campaign

Pin It on Pinterest

Subscribe To Our Newsletter

Join our mailing list to receive the latest news and updates from our Campaign.

Thank you! Please check your email to confirm your subscription.